I HAVE THE FULL NEW ‘SEASHELL’ INDICTMENT OF JAMES COMEY {SNORT} (DOCUMENT INCLUDED)
Well, it turns out that not only would they indict a ham sandwich; they can also indict seashells. Ok, not really, but just about – because this new indictment of James Comey is for posting a picture of seashells. But not just *any* seashells! Seashells which spell out ‘8647’.
Yes, totally ridiculous! BUT here’s what’s really crazy!
This wasn’t a spur of the moment thing! People in the Michigan State Legislature, and in Congress, *last year* were *calling for an investigation into his posting that picture*. Michigan State Reps. Carra, Fox, DeSana, Maddock and Schriver, Senator Tom Cotton (Arkansas), and Congressman Gosar (Arizona) *all* demanded an investigation into Seashellgate (my term, not theirs).
They have all clearly been gargling with red Kook-aid (I truly meant to write Kool-aid, but what a great typo, eh?)
The indictment claims that James Comey “did knowingly and willfully make a threat to take the life of, and to inflict bodily harm upon, the President of the United States, in that he publicly posted a photograph on the internet social media site Instagram which depicted seashells arranged in a pattern making out “86 47.”
OH NOOOO!! THE HORROR!! 😱
Now, the indictment goes on to say that “a reasonable recipient who is familiar with the circumstances would interpret as a serious expression of an intent to do harm to the President of the United States.”
Are you flocking kidding me??
Everybody, but EVERYBODY (except, I guess, those gargling the Kook-aid) knows that “to 86” something means to discard or cancel something. Honestly, when a server at a restaurant says “86 those scrambled eggs” it can hardly be interpreted to mean “murder the scrambled eggs”.
There is more fun to be had in the full indictment, which is included for Notes from the Front members.
This indictment will go the way of all of the other indictments: it will be dismissed (and it will annoy the judge, after it bemuses him).
It’s important to remember that a grand jury being asked to indict someone is only hearing one side – the most heavy-handed “this is a bad guy doing a bad act” side. So you can’t blame them.
But *clearly* the DOJ attorneys have waaaaay too much time on their hands, and waaaaay too few brains in their heads.
Notes from the Front members: the Seashellgate indictment is in your inbox now!
Not a Notes from the Front member? Never miss one of my legal or Epstein updates – get them right in your inbox (no ads, no spam, just legal and Epstein updates)! You can join right now below, get the indictment, and help keep me in coffee to continue my reporting! It also gives you access to all the documents and our private chat! And yes, really, your $5 a month helps support my coffee habit and helps me keep on with all of the research and writing I’m doing from the front. Join now here:
https://annepmitchell.substack.com/p/i-have-the-full-new-seashell-indictment
Otherwise, you can ensure that you never miss an update by getting them directly in your inbox for *free* (yes really) by signing up for my Notes from the Front Lite – it’s like Notes from the Front but without the documents and private chats. You can sign up for that here (it really is completely free, no ads, no spam, just also no documents or private chats): https://notesfromthefront.fyi
P.S. If you actually read all the way to the bottom please leave a comment that includes the word “Seashellgate”. It will show me that my efforts aren’t in vain and that people actually *do* read these things, and it will drive those who just skim crazy wondering why everyone is saying ‘Seashellgate’! ;~)
Source