HOLY FLUX!!! JUDGE *REOPENS* TRUMP’S IRS LAWSUIT CITING “GRIEVOUS ALLEGATIONS” AND ASKS “WAS THE COURT A VICTIM OF FRAUD?”
by Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. – giving you the facts and truth about this administration and the law, in plain English
You heard it here first! (Unless you didn’t.) The judge in that bogus Trump v. IRS lawsuit has just *reopened* the case, after *35 former Federal judges* filed a motion (included for Notes from the Front members) to reopen the case, arguing that Trump perpetrated a fraud on the Court when he, among other things filed a “settlement” that *was never before the Court*!
I need to crow a little bit here because you guys *did* hear *that* here first! I said back on May 19th, the day that the “settlement” (air quotes) was a released, that these were “squirrely documents”. You’ll remember my saying that the Judge made a *point* of saying, in the order closing the case, that:
“Because the Notice does not reference any settlement or include a stipulation of settlement, there is no settlement of record. Additionally, Defendants – federal agencies represented by the Department of Justice, which has an independent obligation to uphold the “public’s strong interest in knowing about the conduct of its Government and expenditure of its resources” and the “fair administration of justice,” neither submitted any settlement documents nor filed any documents ensuring that settlement was appropriate where there was an outstanding question as to whether an actual case or controversy existed.”
Got it? The Judge said NO SETTLEMENT EXISTS.
And then I added that “I think that Judge Williams knew that something squirrely was going on, and she was making damned sure that there was a record. I also suspect that she is feeling used.” (And then I made “squirrely” the magic word for that post. :~) )
Well guess what. That motion to reopen the case by the 35 former Federal judges gave Judge Williams the hook she needed to reopen the case! (Her order included for Notes from the Front members.)
I should say “preopen” the case, because she reopened it just enough to order Trump to appear before the Court on June 12th to, among other things, answer the question of “whether the case should be reopened because the Court was the “victim of a fraud.””
Now, I say Trump, but it’s likely to be just his attorneys. But still…
o/’o/’ There’s gonna be a spanking… o/’o/’
Notes from the Front members: The Motion and the Order are in your inbox now.
If you’re not a Notes from the Front member these documents are a great reason to join! For just $5 a month you can stop relying on this platform’s algorithms to show you my posts because you will get them directly in your inbox along with the documents, where you can save them or delete them as you prefer. *And* you’ll be helping keep me in coffee so that I can continue researching and reporting for you! :~) You can cancel any time, and I make it really easy with a “cancel” button at the bottom of every post. (Don’t you hate it when people make it really hard to cancel?) Join here now:
https://annepmitchell.substack.com/p/holy-flux-judge-reopens-trumps-irs
Don’t have the $5? You can also ensure that you never miss an update by getting them directly in your inbox for *free* (yes really) by signing up for my Notes from the Front Lite – it’s like Notes from the Front but without the documents and coffee. You can sign up for that here (it really is completely free, no ads, no spam, just also no documents or private chats): https://notesfromthefront.fyi
New by popular demand: Many of you have asked how you can support my work without subscribing to my $5 Substack (thank you for asking! ❤️), here’s how: https://www.annepmitchell.com/buy-anne-a-coffee/
P.S. If you actually read all the way to the bottom please leave a comment that includes the word “spank”. It will show me that my efforts aren’t in vain and that people actually *do* read these things, and it will drive those who just skim crazy wondering just why everyone is talking about spanking! ;~)
Source